According to high-level royal insiders, there is increasing suspicion that Archie and Lilibet, the supposed children of Prince Harry and Meg...
According to high-level royal insiders, there is increasing suspicion that Archie and Lilibet, the supposed children of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, may not actually exist at all. Yes, you heard it right, folks. "Monarch Gains" is the name, and paternity fraud might just be its explosive new claim.
Because my sources tell me that King Charles recently uncovered credible evidence casting serious doubts over whether these so-called royal babies are anything more than a calculated fiction to keep the Harkle victimhood grift afloat.
Another unhinged anti-Megan conspiracy theory from that lunatic fringe manbaby subset of the internet. Get a life and leave the poor woman alone. Except this latest shocker seemingly originated from none other than the palace itself.
Based on my insider whispers, you see, ever since that career-defining Oprah interview where Meghan implied someone high up in "The Firm" made racist comments about her unborn children, Charles's advisors have pushed for a full-fledged investigation into the Duchess's admitted history of lying and embellishing stories for public sympathy.
Well, this top-secret probe has apparently uncovered a trail of damning anomalies and blatant inconsistencies surrounding the existence and nature of Harry and Meghan's two supposed offspring. Glaring holes and red flags that their royal highnesses have failed to adequately explain or prove beyond all reasonable doubt.
According to my palace source, for example, did you know that there is allegedly no record of Lilibet Diana's birth anywhere in the California state archives? No hospital admission, no attending physician listings, no birth certificate application filed—nothing. Just the couple's bald-faced claim of her existence backed up by a few optimistically angled publicity photos that any decent Photoshop wizard could easily mock up these days.
But surely there must be some paper trail or legal documentation to verify the healthy arrival of the latest royal blood hater on American soil, right? Wrong.
According to Chuck's investigators, the whole thing appears to be a comprehensive evidentiary mirage with zero official proof little Lilibet was ever born, aside from Harry and Meghan's insistence that she was, of course.
Then there's the increasingly glaring reality that in nearly three years since firstborn Archie's arrival, no credible party from their social circles in England or California has ever credibly verified witnessing the children in the flesh or meeting them in person.
Not Harry's longtime friends, not Meghan's mom Doria, not a single member of their boasted 16-person staff serving the Montecito humble palace.
It's like they have been going through absurd lengths to keep their spawn concealed from public view. So, just what is the truth here? That Harry and Meghan bizarrely chose to raise the first generation of royal heirs entirely in isolation without any social engagement or trusted friends' or family interactions whatsoever? Or could there be something far more nefarious and wildly unbelievable at play?
According to another royal insider I spoke with, it's the latter possibility, leaving King Charles himself gobsmacked. Because my source claims Charles is now giving credence to the idea that Harry's wife didn't actually carry any biological children during her supposed two pregnancies.
Instead, the whole Archie and Lilibet narrative was an elaborately staged hoax designed to further burnish Meghan's relatability as the socially conscious mother, a wholesome personal branding exercise to distract from her vacuous Hollywood past.
If true, it would make Oprah's accusations of concerns and conversations over how dark the imaginary Archie's skin tone might be even more reprehensibly cynical. Like intentionally goading international anti-racist fervor over an absolute non-issue to manufacture racial division and royalist controversy where none actually existed.
No comments