No cake, no kids, no pictures—George and Amal Clooney debunk weird details about Lili's third birthday. According to People magazine, L...
No cake, no kids, no pictures—George and Amal Clooney debunk weird details about Lili's third birthday. According to People magazine, Lili celebrated her birthday this past weekend, although her actual birthday was on the 4th. Friends and family attended the event, but no further details were available about the celebration.
The magazine reported that the family held a small party at their home in Montecito, California. Guests included close friends and family, as well as some of Lili's friends. However, People didn't provide any new information about the party, such as cake, decorations, or specifics.
There was some speculation about the participants, mentioning Marcus Anderson and Doria Ragland, which sounds like an interesting combination for a children's party.
There was skepticism about the event, with comments about how they shared a photo from one of Archie's birthday parties showing just Harry, Meghan, and Doria sitting around a high chair with no guests. Another photo of one of Lili's birthdays shows a similar setting with just Harry, Meghan, and Archie.
Archie's fourth birthday coincided with the coronation, so he couldn't attend the event in England, and Harry quickly left to attend a family celebration. Harry even skipped the first day of the trial for Lili's second birthday but had no problem missing Archie's third birthday to attend a polo match.
Critics say the magazines publish any gossip the celebrity provides and that the events may not have happened as reported. Despite claiming privacy concerns and not releasing photos of Lili's birthday, the Sussexes announced the celebration through People magazine. This is in contrast to genuine celebrities like Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds or George and Amal Clooney, who keep their children's lives private and don't publicize their birthday parties.
Skepticism extends to doubts about the existence of these children, suggesting that if they were imaginary, then birthdays could be created without the use of photos or actual events.
No comments