Meghan Markle’s Baby Bombshell: Why Thomas Markle’s Claims About Frozen Eggs Deserve Serious Consideration
Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has been a polarizing figure since her entry into the British royal family. From her high-profile wedding to Prince Harry to her decision to step back from royal duties, every aspect of her life has been scrutinized, often unfairly, by the media and public alike. Recently, claims attributed to her estranged father, Thomas Markle Sr., have reignited controversy, alleging that Meghan froze her eggs years ago as a strategic move to secure her reproductive future. This revelation, often dismissed as tabloid fodder, warrants a deeper, more critical examination—not only for its potential veracity but also for what it reveals about Meghan’s agency, the pressures of public life, and the toxic dynamics of her family relationships. Far from being a mere “bombshell” for clickbait headlines, Thomas Markle’s claims could reflect a pragmatic decision by a woman navigating the complexities of fertility, fame, and familial estrangement, and they demand a nuanced analysis rather than knee-jerk skepticism.
### The Context of Thomas Markle’s Claims
Thomas Markle Sr., a retired Hollywood lighting director, has had a fraught relationship with his daughter since her rise to global prominence. His public statements, often filtered through tabloids or sensationalized media outlets, have been met with distrust, largely due to his history of selling stories to the press and his absence from Meghan’s life during key moments, such as her wedding. The claim that Meghan froze her eggs years ago, reportedly made by Thomas and echoed by Meghan’s half-sister Samantha, surfaced in various media reports, including a 2025 article from the Times of India, which noted Samantha’s assertion that Thomas mentioned Meghan retrieving her frozen eggs nine months before the birth of her son, Archie, in 2019. This claim has been weaponized by critics to fuel conspiracy theories about Meghan’s pregnancies, with some alleging she used a surrogate or even faked her pregnancies altogether—a narrative that has gained traction on platforms like X and Reddit.[](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/meghan-markle-faces-surrogacy-controversy-as-estranged-father-doubts-archies-birth-what-happens-to-the-line-of-succession/articleshow/116894821.cms)[](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/1hk4299/bookworm2_claims_to_have_a_source_with_specific/)[](https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/meghan-markle-s-love-story-anniversary-tribute-to-prince-harry-reignites-fake-baby-bump-conspiracy-101747702333280.html)
At first glance, it’s tempting to dismiss Thomas’s claims as the ramblings of an estranged parent seeking relevance. After all, his credibility is questionable, given his track record of speaking to the press for financial gain and his apparent lack of direct communication with Meghan since 2018. However, dismissing his statements outright ignores the broader context of Meghan’s life and the plausibility of his claims within the framework of modern reproductive technology. Egg freezing is a common practice, particularly among women in their 30s in high-pressure industries like Hollywood, where Meghan built her career before marrying Prince Harry. To critically assess Thomas’s claims, we must move beyond the sensationalism and consider the evidence, Meghan’s circumstances, and the societal biases that shape how her story is received.[](https://www.draimee.org/did-meghan-markle-do-fertility-treatment)
### The Plausibility of Egg Freezing: Meghan’s Context
Meghan Markle was 36 when she married Prince Harry in 2018, an age at which many women face increasing pressure to consider their fertility options. As a successful actress on the television series *Suits*, Meghan was part of an industry where women often delay motherhood due to demanding careers. A 2018 report from RadarOnline.com claimed that Meghan underwent fertility tests before her engagement to Harry, a requirement allegedly imposed by the royal family to ensure her ability to produce heirs—a practice reportedly applied to Princess Diana as well. The same report noted that Meghan froze her eggs as “insurance” against fertility challenges, given her age and the ticking biological clock that women in their late 30s often face.[](https://radaronline.com/videos/meghan-markle-undergoes-fertility-tests-frozen-eggs-prince-harry-marriage/)[](https://radaronline.com/exclusives/2018/10/meghan-markle-undergoes-fertility-tests-frozen-eggs-prince-harry-marriage/)
Egg freezing, or oocyte cryopreservation, is a well-established procedure that allows women to preserve their fertility by extracting and freezing eggs for future use. As noted by fertility specialist Dr. Aimee Eyvazzadeh in a 2018 blog post, freezing eggs in one’s 30s can improve the chances of pregnancy, particularly for women like Meghan who may have anticipated delaying motherhood. The live birth rate for a 36-year-old woman using ten frozen eggs is approximately 60%, and at 37, it remains around 50%—statistically significant odds that make egg freezing a practical choice for someone in Meghan’s position. Given her financial resources, access to top-tier medical care, and awareness of her biological clock, it is entirely plausible that Meghan would have pursued this option, especially during her years in Toronto, where she lived and worked before her marriage. A reported trip to Toronto in 2018, speculated to be fertility-related, further supports the possibility that she was actively managing her reproductive future.[](https://www.draimee.org/did-meghan-markle-do-fertility-treatment)[](https://www.draimee.org/did-meghan-markle-do-fertility-treatment)[](https://www.draimee.org/did-meghan-markle-do-fertility-treatment)
Thomas’s claim that Meghan retrieved her frozen eggs nine months before Archie’s birth aligns with the timeline of her pregnancy. Archie was born in May 2019, and a trip to Los Angeles or Toronto in late 2018 could have been related to fertility treatments, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), using previously frozen eggs. While there is no definitive proof of Meghan undergoing IVF, the absence of such evidence does not negate the possibility. Medical privacy laws and Meghan’s understandable desire for discretion mean that such details would likely remain confidential. Thomas’s knowledge of this decision, if true, could stem from earlier conversations during a time when their relationship was less strained, or even from secondhand information within family circles. Dismissing his claim solely because of his estrangement ignores the fact that family members, even distant ones, often possess intimate details about each other’s lives.[](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/meghan-markle-faces-surrogacy-controversy-as-estranged-father-doubts-archies-birth-what-happens-to-the-line-of-succession/articleshow/116894821.cms)
### The Media and Public’s Rush to Judgment
SCROLL DOWN TO CONTINUE
Thomas’s claims, while controversial, should not be automatically lumped in with these conspiracies. The idea that Meghan froze her eggs is a far cry from the outlandish assertions that she faked her pregnancies. Egg freezing is a practical, science-backed decision, not a scandal. Yet, the media’s framing of Thomas’s statements as a “baby bombshell” sensationalizes a choice that is increasingly common among women of Meghan’s age and socioeconomic status. This framing reflects a double standard: when celebrities like Khloé Kardashian or Scheana Shay openly discuss egg freezing, they are often praised for their foresight, yet Meghan’s alleged decision is treated as fodder for gossip. The disparity underscores how Meghan is held to an impossible standard, where even her reproductive choices are weaponized against her.[](https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-moms/pictures/celebrities-open-up-about-freezing-eggs-embryos/)[](https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-moms/pictures/celebrities-open-up-about-freezing-eggs-embryos/)
### The Family Dynamic: Estrangement and Truth
The strained relationship between Meghan and her father complicates the narrative but does not necessarily discredit his claims. Thomas Markle has been vocal about his desire to reconnect with his daughter and meet his grandchildren, a sentiment that has been met with skepticism due to his media appearances. A 2022 Express.co.uk article reported on Thomas launching a YouTube channel to share “his truth,” suggesting a pattern of seeking public attention. However, estrangement does not preclude knowledge of past events. Thomas may have been privy to Meghan’s fertility decisions during a time when they were closer, possibly during her years in Hollywood or her first marriage to Trevor Engelson. A Reddit thread on the *SaintMeghanMarkle* subreddit speculated that Thomas might have paid for Meghan’s egg freezing, a plausible scenario given his career in the entertainment industry and potential financial support for his daughter’s aspirations.[](https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1579852/Meghan-Markle-dad-Thomas-Markle-starts-Youtube-channel-family-claims-latest-video-today)[](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/18reztd/is_there_any_evidence_that_markle_froze_her_eggs/)
Moreover, the dynamics of family estrangement are complex. Thomas’s decision to speak to the press may reflect desperation, hurt, or a misguided attempt to reclaim relevance, but it does not inherently mean his claims are false. Meghan’s silence on the matter is understandable, given her focus on protecting her family’s privacy and avoiding further media frenzy. However, this silence has allowed narratives like Thomas’s to fill the void, often without critical interrogation. A 2025 Newsweek article highlighted the “full-blown harassment campaign” Meghan faced over her children, with supporters like Christopher Bouzy condemning the trolls who perpetuate conspiracy theories. Yet, even Bouzy’s defense does not address the specific claim about egg freezing, leaving it in a gray area of speculation.[](https://www.newsweek.com/meghan-markle-happiest-moments-hate-instagram-pregnancy-trolls-2083761)
### Why Thomas’s Claims Matter
Supporting Thomas Markle’s claims does not mean endorsing his behavior or dismissing Meghan’s right to privacy. Rather, it means acknowledging the plausibility of his statement within the context of Meghan’s life and the broader societal trends around fertility. Egg freezing is a proactive choice that aligns with Meghan’s image as a forward-thinking, independent woman who has navigated multiple high-stakes environments—Hollywood, the royal family, and now her own media ventures. Her decision to freeze her eggs, if true, would reflect a strategic approach to her future, particularly as she faced the pressures of royal expectations and public scrutiny.
Furthermore, Thomas’s claims highlight the intersection of personal agency and public perception. Meghan’s reproductive choices, whether they involve egg freezing, IVF, or natural conception, are her own. Yet, the media’s obsession with her pregnancies reveals a deeper discomfort with women who defy traditional roles. By framing Thomas’s claims as a “bombshell,” the media perpetuates a narrative that casts Meghan as secretive or manipulative, rather than a woman making informed decisions about her body. This narrative is particularly insidious given the racial undertones in criticisms of Meghan, as noted in Reddit discussions that accuse her of “not wanting to be black” or fearing a “black child.” These comments, steeped in racism, underscore why Meghan might choose to keep her fertility decisions private.[](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/18reztd/is_there_any_evidence_that_markle_froze_her_eggs/)
### A Call for Critical Empathy
In conclusion, Thomas Markle’s claims about Meghan freezing her eggs years ago should not be dismissed as mere tabloid gossip. While his motives and credibility are questionable, the plausibility of his statement is supported by Meghan’s age, career, and access to reproductive technology. The media’s sensationalization of this claim, coupled with public conspiracy theories, reflects a broader tendency to vilify Meghan for choices that are routine for women of her stature. Rather than fueling speculation, we should approach Thomas’s claims with critical empathy, recognizing the complexities of Meghan’s life as a public figure, a mother, and a daughter navigating a fractured family.
Meghan’s silence on the matter is not an admission of guilt but a refusal to engage with a media machine that thrives on her vulnerability. By giving Thomas’s claims the benefit of the doubt—not as truth, but as a plausible piece of a larger puzzle—we can shift the conversation from scandal to understanding. Meghan Markle’s story is not one of “bombshells” but of resilience in the face of relentless scrutiny. Her alleged decision to freeze her eggs, if true, is a testament to her agency, not a conspiracy to be debunked. It’s time we stop punishing her for it.
**Sources**:
- r/SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit[](https://www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/18reztd/is_there_any_evidence_that_markle_froze_her_eggs/)
- Times of India[](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/meghan-markle-faces-surrogacy-controversy-as-estranged-father-doubts-archies-birth-what-happens-to-the-line-of-succession/articleshow/116894821.cms)
- RadarOnline.com[](https://radaronline.com/videos/meghan-markle-undergoes-fertility-tests-frozen-eggs-prince-harry-marriage/)
- DrAimee.org[](https://www.draimee.org/did-meghan-markle-do-fertility-treatment)
- RadarOnline.com[](https://radaronline.com/exclusives/2018/10/meghan-markle-undergoes-fertility-tests-frozen-eggs-prince-harry-marriage/)
- Newsweek[](https://www.newsweek.com/meghan-markle-happiest-moments-hate-instagram-pregnancy-trolls-2083761)
- Daily Mail[](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14786549/Meghan-moonbump-pregnancy-conspiracy-theory-video.html)
- Express.co.uk[](https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1579852/Meghan-Markle-dad-Thomas-Markle-starts-Youtube-channel-family-claims-latest-video-today)
- Hindustan Times[](https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/meghan-markle-s-love-story-anniversary-tribute-to-prince-harry-reignites-fake-baby-bump-conspiracy-101747702333280.html)
