Meghan Markle's shocking claim "I was a virgin when I married Harry" He is the first Ever"

 

A Critical Examination of Meghan Markle’s Public Persona and the Claim of Virginity Before Marriage to Prince Harry

Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has been a polarizing figure since her marriage to Prince Harry in May 2018. Her transition from an American actress to a member of the British royal family, followed by her departure from royal duties in 2020, has kept her in the global spotlight. While some view her as a trailblazer challenging the rigidity of royal tradition, others perceive her as a calculated opportunist whose actions and statements often invite skepticism. Among the many claims attributed to her, the alleged statement, "I was a virgin when I married Harry. He is the first ever," has sparked significant controversy, raising questions about her credibility and motives. This essay critically examines this claim, alongside broader concerns about Meghan’s public persona, arguing that her statements and actions often reflect inconsistencies that undermine her trustworthiness.

### The Virginity Claim: A Lack of Verifiable Evidence

The alleged claim that Meghan Markle was a virgin when she married Prince Harry in 2018 is a striking example of the contentious narratives surrounding her. No credible primary source, such as a direct quote from Meghan herself in a verifiable interview or publication, supports this statement. The lack of evidence suggests that this claim may be a fabrication or exaggeration, possibly originating from tabloid speculation or social media rumors, which have frequently distorted Meghan’s narrative for sensationalist purposes. Given her public history, including a previous marriage to Trevor Engelson from 2011 to 2014, the claim seems implausible and inconsistent with her lived experience as a woman in her mid-30s at the time of her marriage to Harry.

The absence of a verifiable source for this statement raises significant questions about its authenticity. If Meghan did make such a claim, it would represent a bold and highly personal assertion that contradicts common expectations about her life before Harry. Without evidence, however, the claim appears to be a rumor designed to provoke outrage or fascination, further muddying the waters of her public image. This scenario aligns with a broader pattern of Meghan being associated with unverified or exaggerated stories, some of which she has not directly addressed, allowing speculation to flourish.

### Meghan’s History of Inconsistent Statements

Beyond the virginity claim, Meghan’s public statements have often been scrutinized for inconsistencies, contributing to perceptions of her as untrustworthy. One notable example is her assertion during the 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview that she did not research Prince Harry or the royal family before their relationship began. She stated, “I didn’t do any research about what that would mean… I’d never looked up my husband online,” claiming she relied solely on Harry’s disclosures. However, this narrative is contradicted by reports from sources close to her, such as her former talent manager Gina Nelthorpe-Cowne, who claimed Meghan “googled Harry” and “had gone deeply into his life” before meeting him. Additionally, a 2014 blog post on her lifestyle website, The Tig, referenced Prince William and Kate Middleton’s wedding, suggesting at least some prior awareness of the royal family.

This discrepancy fuels skepticism about Meghan’s truthfulness. Her claim of ignorance about the royals seems implausible given her documented interest in public figures and her career as a blogger, which required a keen awareness of cultural trends. Critics argue that her narrative of naivety serves to craft an image of innocence, distancing her from accusations of opportunism. However, the contradiction between her statements and evidence from her past undermines this image, portraying her as someone who selectively curates her story to fit a desired narrative.

### The Opportunism Narrative: A Calculated Approach?

SCROLL DOWN TO CONTINUE

Meghan’s critics often portray her as a calculated figure who leveraged her marriage to Harry for personal gain. Author Tom Bower, in his book *Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War Between the Windsors*, argues that Meghan “was on a manhunt” and “researched Harry’s weaknesses” to position herself as his ideal partner. This perspective is reinforced by her rapid transition from actress to global celebrity, capitalizing on her royal status through high-profile projects like the Netflix deal, her memoir, and her lifestyle brand, As Ever. Critics contend that her actions—such as the Oprah interview, where she made serious allegations about the royal family, including claims of racism—were strategic moves to maintain relevance and financial success after leaving royal duties.

The launch of As Ever has been particularly contentious, with brand experts like Phillip Millar and Camille Moore labeling it a poorly executed attempt to “milk” her fame from marrying Harry to “sucker people into buying her stuff.” The brand’s rapid sell-outs, while commercially successful, have been criticized for exploiting the “Meghan Markle effect” without offering substantial value. This perception of opportunism is compounded by her decision to step back from royal duties, which some see as a rejection of duty in favor of personal ambition. Royal commentator Ingrid Seward has argued that Meghan’s actions demonstrate “no sense of duty toward the British public nor the institution,” further alienating her from monarchists and critics who view her as self-serving.

### The Royal Rift: Amplifying Distrust

Meghan’s role in the ongoing feud between Prince Harry and the royal family has also drawn significant criticism. Her and Harry’s public disclosures—through interviews, the Netflix series *Harry & Meghan*, and Harry’s memoir *Spare*—have been seen as breaches of trust that exacerbate familial tensions. In *Spare*, Harry recounts incidents such as Prince William calling Meghan “difficult” and “rude,” and alleges physical altercations with his brother. These revelations, coupled with Meghan’s claims during the Oprah interview about an unnamed royal questioning the skin color of their unborn child, have been perceived by some as deliberate attempts to damage the royal family’s reputation for personal gain.[](https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/prince-williams-mistrust-meghan-markle-stalling-peace-prince-harry-author)[](https://www.newsnationnow.com/entertainment-news/meghan-markle-prince-harry-royal-timeline/)

Critics argue that Meghan’s willingness to air private grievances publicly undermines her credibility. Royal expert Charlotte Griffiths noted that Harry’s decision to reveal royal secrets in interviews and his memoir constitutes an “unforgivable sin” in the eyes of King Charles, who is wary of further leaks. This pattern of public disclosures has led to accusations that Meghan and Harry prioritize media attention over reconciliation, with Meghan often seen as the driving force behind their media strategy. The perception that she encourages Harry to distance himself from his family, combined with her own estrangement from her father, Thomas Markle, reinforces the narrative of her as a divisive figure.[](https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/articles/meghan-markle-reportedly-terrified-prince-211525885.html)[](https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/prince-williams-mistrust-meghan-markle-stalling-peace-prince-harry-author)

### The Virginity Claim in Context: A Symptom of Broader Issues

The alleged virginity claim, while unverified, fits into a broader narrative of Meghan’s critics who see her as prone to exaggeration or fabrication. Whether or not she made the statement, its circulation reflects the intense scrutiny she faces and the ease with which unverified stories gain traction. The claim’s implausibility, given her age, previous marriage, and public persona, mirrors other instances where her statements have been questioned, such as her claim of not researching Harry or her portrayal of royal life as unexpectedly challenging.[](https://www.vanityfair.com/topic/meghan-markle)[](https://www.newsweek.com/meghan-markle-tom-bower-book-googled-harry-claims-1727618)

This pattern suggests a deliberate effort to craft a narrative that aligns with her desired image—whether as an innocent outsider, a victim of royal mistreatment, or a successful entrepreneur. However, the inconsistencies in her statements, coupled with her strategic use of media, undermine her credibility. Critics argue that her actions reflect a lack of authenticity, as she appears to tailor her story to suit different audiences, whether it’s the American public, royal watchers, or her consumer base.[](https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14924463/Meghan-Markle-fraud-milking-fame-Prince-Harry-Ever.html)

### Counterarguments: Defending Meghan’s Intentions

To be fair, Meghan’s supporters argue that she has been unfairly targeted by a hostile British media and a traditionalist royal establishment. They contend that her mixed-race background and American upbringing made her a target for criticism, with narratives of dishonesty or opportunism rooted in prejudice. Her advocates point out that the royal family’s own secrecy and reluctance to address her allegations—such as the racism claims—lend credence to her version of events. Furthermore, her charitable work through the Archewell Foundation, focusing on women’s empowerment and racial justice, demonstrates a commitment to social good that counters accusations of self-interest.[](https://www.newsweek.com/topic/meghan-markle)[](https://people.com/tag/meghan-markle/)

However, these defenses do not fully address the inconsistencies in her statements or the perception that she exploits her royal connections for profit. While media bias and racial prejudice may play a role in shaping public perception, the contradictions in her narrative—such as the virginity claim, if true, or her denial of researching Harry—provide ample fodder for critics. Her decision to step back from royal duties, while framed as a quest for independence, is seen by detractors as a rejection of responsibility, particularly when contrasted with the continued public service of other royals like Prince William and Kate Middleton.[](https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/prince-williams-mistrust-meghan-markle-stalling-peace-prince-harry-author)

### Conclusion: A Question of Trust

Meghan Markle’s public persona is a complex tapestry of ambition, controversy, and contradiction. The alleged claim of virginity before her marriage to Prince Harry, while unverified, encapsulates the broader issues surrounding her credibility. Her history of inconsistent statements, strategic media engagements, and perceived opportunism have fueled a narrative of distrust that overshadows her charitable efforts and personal achievements. While some may argue that she is a victim of unfair scrutiny, the evidence suggests that her actions—whether through selective storytelling or public disclosures—contribute significantly to the skepticism she faces.

Ultimately, Meghan’s journey from actress to duchess to entrepreneur reflects a calculated approach to fame and influence, but one that often lacks transparency. The virginity claim, whether real or fabricated, serves as a microcosm of the challenges she faces in maintaining public trust. As she continues to build her brand and navigate her post-royal life, Meghan must address these inconsistencies to reshape her narrative. Until then, critics will likely continue to view her as a figure whose ambition outpaces her authenticity, perpetuating the perception of her as a liar in the court of public opinion.