WATCH VIDEO: Meghan MoonBump Markle’s Ultimate Deception EXPOSED: Phantom Kids Archie & Lilibet NEVER Born to Her – Time for King Charles to Boot the Surrogate Scions from Succession and Exile Treacherous Harry for Good!


In a scandal that's rocking the very foundations of the British monarchy, the long-festering rumors about Meghan Markle's "moonbump" pregnancies have erupted into a full-blown crisis, with explosive claims that the Duchess of Sussex never gave birth to her so-called children, Prince Archie (or "Archifical," as critics mock the invisible tot) and Princess Lilibet (aka "Invisibet," the phantom princess hidden from public view). 


Fueled by her estranged family's damning accusations and a web of inconsistencies surrounding their births, this surrogacy hoax isn't just tabloid fodder—it's a deliberate fraud that's tainted the royal line of succession. As Buckingham Palace faces mounting pressure to purge these surrogate-born imposters from the throne's roster, the real question burning: Should King Charles finally strip treacherous Prince Harry of his titles and boot him out too, for dragging the Firm into this web of deceit? With the Sussexes' credibility in tatters amid their flop Netflix deals and glitchy jam jars, this moonbump mess could be the final nail in Megxit's coffin. Dive deep into the lies, the lineage, and why the royals must act now to salvage their sacred bloodline!


The controversy, which has simmered since Archie's "birth" in 2019, exploded anew in early 2025 when Meghan's estranged father, Thomas Markle, and half-sister, Samantha Markle, unleashed a torrent of doubts that have royal experts demanding DNA tests and birth certificate audits. Thomas, 80 and estranged from his daughter since her wedding drama, reportedly told insiders nine months before Archie's arrival that Meghan had retrieved her "frozen eggs," hinting at surrogacy involvement—a claim Samantha amplified in interviews, questioning, "Why the secrecy?" This isn't sibling sniping; it's a family indictment of a hoax that's fooled the world. 



RadarOnline reports that Buckingham Palace is under siege from courtiers and succession purists, who insist Archie and Lilibet—sixth and seventh in line to the throne—be removed until Meghan provides "absolute proof" she physically birthed them. Lady Colin Campbell, the no-holds-barred royal author, slammed the Sussexes for creating a "conspiracy of silence," declaring, "The whole thing stinks to high heaven. Meghan has caused people to believe the children were born by surrogacy. Clear it up once and for all—there should be no mystery as to who is legitimately in the line of succession." With the kids' faces barely glimpsed in public (Archie's last clear photo was at age two, Lilibet's a blurry toddler snap), skeptics argue this invisibility is deliberate—to hide the truth that these "phantom children" are surrogate spawn, not Markle heirs.


Let's rewind to the moonbump madness that started it all. During her 2019 pregnancy with Archie, Meghan's baby bump became a punchline for conspiracy theorists, who pored over photos showing what looked like a prosthetic "moonbump"—a fake belly from a costume company that allegedly shifted unnaturally, popped in and out like a deflating balloon, and even featured a retractable belly button. Viral clips from events like the Australia tour captured her cradling the "bump" in ways that screamed artifice: one moment it's ballooning out, the next it's folding awkwardly as she bends or dances. Reddit's r/SaintMeghanMarkle subreddit, a hotbed of anti-Sussex sentiment, has threads dissecting these anomalies, with users noting, "You can't buy a moonbump that looks so misshapen... but Meghan's did, every time." The birth itself? A farce. Palace announcements claimed Meghan went into labor at 5:28 a.m. on May 6, but Archie magically "arrived" by 11:59 p.m. the same day— a 19-hour window that conveniently allowed her to check out of Portland Hospital after just two hours, defying medical norms for a first-time mom. No hospital photos, no doctor's signatures on the birth certificate (unlike William and Catherine's births), and an 11-day amendment to list Meghan as "Her Royal Highness" instead of her legal name—smells like a cover-up to retroactively legitimize a surrogate situation.


Fast-forward to Lilibet's 2021 "birth," and the red flags multiply. Born in Santa Barbara, California, amid a global pandemic, the announcement was shrouded in even more secrecy—no witnesses, no royal doctors, just a vague press release. Skeptics point to Meghan's public appearances shortly before and after, looking suspiciously trim, with no signs of postpartum recovery. Her half-sister Samantha has been vocal, claiming in a Dan Wootton interview that "if they used a surrogate, admit it," while Thomas echoed doubts about the children's legitimacy. Explosive reports from Amber Exposé allege a Colorado surrogate for Lilibet, with legal paperwork omitting Meghan's full name and Harry's title potentially voiding U.S. parental rights. And the kids' hair? Social media sleuths compare their straight locks to Meghan's curls, insisting "there's no way those kids are hers"—likely from an egg donor and surrogate. One X user quipped, "Meghan's moonbump #meghanmarkle #archie #lilibet," linking to damning videos. Even German press has piled on, with headlines like "Surrogate mother scandal around Archie and Lilibet: Baby vertigo flies: Didn't Meghan Markle give birth to her children herself?"


SCROLL DOWN TO CONTINUE

This isn't harmless gossip—it's a constitutional crisis. Under British law, heirs must be "of the body" of the royal parent, meaning surrogacy could disqualify Archie and Lilibet from the line of succession. Royal historian Lady Colin Campbell warns they're "one plane crash away from the throne," demanding transparency to protect the monarchy from fraud. Critics like those on X argue, "Why should they have titles if we are not allowed to see them even? Cannot have it both ways." Neighbors report moving vans at Montecito but "NO ONE has ever claimed to have seen Harry and Meghan’s fake kids"—fueling theories they don't exist or are rented props. Stassi Schroeder's claims that she "rents her daughter to Meghan" only add to the circus. And Harry's role? Speculation swirls he may not even be Lilibet's biological father due to past medical issues.


Harry's treachery seals the deal. From his *Spare* bombshells accusing William of assault to the Oprah racism allegations, he's betrayed the Firm at every turn. His recent UK visit—snubbed by William, a brief tea with Charles—highlights the rift, with insiders saying reconciliation requires groveling he won't do. Experts like Ingrid Seward call for stripping his titles, viewing him as a "dope of a husband" enabling Meghan's "cheap hustler" schemes. The Sussexes' ventures? Disasters. Netflix duds, As Ever's "vulgar" jams, Invictus feuds— all while hiding the kids to perpetuate the lie. Meanwhile, William and Catherine shine with genuine family moments, like her BSL tributes to Diana.


King Charles must act: Remove the phantoms from succession, demand DNA proof, and exile Harry for his betrayal. As one X post blasts, "Meghan Markle was not wearing a moonbump ever? April Fools!" The monarchy's integrity hangs by a thread—time to cut the Sussex strings before they unravel the Crown!


WATCH VIDEO BELOW;



Previous Post Next Post